Around 2017, we were forced to ask a simple question:
What is closest to an actual product, with actual customers, in an actual market?
The uncomfortable answer was EV charging.
That was not obvious at the time. Investors were still asking whether electric cars would “really win” over hydrogen and other technologies. The easy choice, emotionally, would have been to keep the space projects, the water projects, the “big ideas” alive a bit longer. Not to cut them completely off, but continue the work.
Internally, it was painful. There were strong disagreements between employees, in the board, and among founders. We had invested a lot of identity in those projects.
But the conclusion was clear: if we wanted Zaptec to survive, we had to kill almost everything except EV charging. Focus the people, the capital and the attention on one thing. And then make it work.
Looking back, I think we should have done this much earlier. But that's easy to say ...
Most founders, including us, start out madly in love with their own idea. You see the future so clearly that you believe the job is to convince the market it needs this. It’s a much longer and harder path than starting with what the market actually needs and then building the product to match.
That shift, from “convince the world” to “serve a real need”, is what took us from a drunken walk to a real company.
Today, we are applying the same discipline of focus to something bigger: not the survival of Zaptec, but the role Zaptec will play in Europe’s energy system.